PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAG vs. RDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAG vs. RDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than RDTE's 17.99% return.


YMAG

1D
0.17%
1M
1.55%
6M
2.76%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.47%

RDTE

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.99%
6M
11.60%
YTD
17.99%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAG vs. RDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and RDTE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.56

The correlation between YMAG and RDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAG vs. RDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

RDTE
RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAG vs. RDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAGRDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.92

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

10.12

-6.73

YMAG vs. RDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the RDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and RDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. RDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than RDTE's maximum drawdown of -24.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and RDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAGRDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-24.32%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-9.17%

-5.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-1.13%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-4.40%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

2.64%

+2.10%

Volatility

YMAG vs. RDTE - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) at 3.52%. This indicates that YMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAGRDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

3.52%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

13.01%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.47%

16.97%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

19.01%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

19.01%

+1.97%

YMAG vs. RDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than RDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAG vs. RDTE - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.07%, more than RDTE's 44.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YMAG and RDTE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAG has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to RDTE (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs RDTE's -24.32%.

On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 26.64% vs 16.04% for YMAG. On fees, RDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 26.64% return vs 16.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 51.07%, compared with 44.33% for RDTE.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.97% for RDTE.

RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAG and RDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer