YLD vs. PY
YLD (Principal Active High Yield ETF) and PY (Principal Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YLD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Principal, while PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, YLD returned 5.73%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for PY. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PY.
Performance
YLD vs. PY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than PY's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, YLD has underperformed PY with an annualized return of 5.73%, while PY has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.
YLD
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
PY
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 15.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
YLD vs. PY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 2.97% | 6.55% | 9.19% | 12.93% | -8.78% | 9.17% | 1.50% | 13.58% | -3.30% | 9.12% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.93% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 18.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between YLD and PY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.39 |
The correlation between YLD and PY shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
YLD vs. PY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YLD
PY
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
YLD
PY
Basic Materials
YLD
-
PY
Communication Services
YLD
-
PY
Consumer Cyclical
YLD
-
PY
Consumer Defensive
YLD
-
PY
Energy
YLD
-
PY
Financial Services
YLD
-
PY
Healthcare
YLD
-
PY
Industrials
YLD
-
PY
Technology
YLD
-
PY
Utilities
YLD
-
PY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YLD vs. PY — Risk / Return Rank
YLD
PY
YLD vs. PY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Principal Value ETF (PY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YLD | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.52 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 8.46 | +4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YLD | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.49 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.48 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.54 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
YLD vs. PY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, smaller than the maximum PY drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and PY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YLD | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.34% | -45.44% | +17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -6.20% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.62% | -17.84% | +12.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.89% | -17.84% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.34% | -45.44% | +17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.24% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -5.05% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 1.85% | -1.28% |
Volatility
YLD vs. PY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) is 1.31%, while Principal Value ETF (PY) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that YLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YLD | PY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 2.30% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 7.32% | -3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 10.52% | -6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 15.77% | -9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 20.07% | -11.86% |
YLD vs. PY - Expense Ratio Comparison
YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
YLD vs. PY - Dividend Comparison
YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than PY's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.11% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% | 0.00% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 7.26% | 7.33% | 7.12% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 3.92% | 4.40% | 4.81% | 5.42% | 6.28% | 4.47% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YLD and PY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PY has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to YLD (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs PY's -45.44%.
On 10-year performance, PY leads with 10.73% vs 5.73% for YLD. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, YLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PY has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for YLD.
YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 2.11% for PY.
YLD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PY is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 0.15% for PY.
YLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YLD and PY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer