PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLD vs. HNDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLD vs. HNDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than HNDL's 6.31% return.


YLD

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.01%
6M
2.42%
YTD
3.34%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
5.58%
ALL TIME*
5.33%

HNDL

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.83%
6M
4.60%
YTD
6.31%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.07M$1.08M$1.31M
$3.84M$3.59M$3.77M

YLD vs. HNDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
3.34%6.55%9.19%12.93%-8.78%9.17%1.50%13.58%-3.96%
HNDL
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF
6.31%10.76%10.66%13.28%-19.12%9.06%12.03%15.66%-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between YLD and HNDL is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018

0.54

The correlation between YLD and HNDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLD vs. HNDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YLD
YLD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
YLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
YLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

HNDL
HNDL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YLD vs. HNDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YLDHNDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.28

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

9.13

+0.66

YLD vs. HNDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the HNDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLD and HNDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YLD vs. HNDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, which is greater than HNDL's maximum drawdown of -23.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and HNDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDHNDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-23.72%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-4.96%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.62%

-12.25%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

-23.72%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.34%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-4.79%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

1.24%

-0.66%

Volatility

YLD vs. HNDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) is 0.77%, while Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that YLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDHNDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.58%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

5.87%

-2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

7.55%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

11.56%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.11%

10.69%

-2.58%

YLD vs. HNDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HNDL's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLD vs. HNDL - Dividend Comparison

YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than HNDL's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HNDL
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF
6.98%6.86%7.02%6.78%7.87%6.86%6.21%5.27%6.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
6.70%7.33%7.12%6.46%6.51%3.92%4.40%4.81%5.42%6.28%4.47%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLD and HNDL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HNDL has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to YLD (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs HNDL's -23.72%.

On 5-year performance, YLD leads with 4.66% vs 4.38% for HNDL. On fees, YLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, YLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YLD has performed better with a 4.66% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HNDL.

HNDL has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 6.70% for YLD.

YLD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while HNDL is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Strategy Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 0.97% for HNDL.

HNDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLD and HNDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer