PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YINN vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YINN vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of -19.13%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.74% annualized return.


YINN

1D
-0.52%
1M
-10.06%
YTD
-28.25%
6M
-32.42%
1Y
-20.61%
3Y*
-2.89%
5Y*
-38.69%
10Y*
-19.13%

SPUU

1D
0.70%
1M
9.03%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.95%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
20.36%
10Y*
24.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-28.25%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
20.66%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and SPUU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.51

The correlation between YINN and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YINN vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YINN
SPUU

Financial Services

34.7%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

27.4%
4.2%

Communication Services

15.7%
4.6%

Energy

5.6%
1.4%

Technology

5.5%
16.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.7%

Industrials

2.4%
3.3%

Healthcare

2.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
2.0%

Utilities

0.4%
1.1%

Financial Services

YINN
34.7%
SPUU
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

YINN
27.4%
SPUU
4.2%

Communication Services

YINN
15.7%
SPUU
4.6%

Energy

YINN
5.6%
SPUU
1.4%

Technology

YINN
5.5%
SPUU
16.5%

Basic Materials

YINN
4.2%
SPUU
0.7%

Industrials

YINN
2.4%
SPUU
3.3%

Healthcare

YINN
2.3%
SPUU
3.6%

Real Estate

YINN
1.0%
SPUU
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

YINN
0.9%
SPUU
2.0%

Utilities

YINN
0.4%
SPUU
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YINN vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YINNSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.38

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

3.01

-3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

13.28

-14.13

YINN vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YINNSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

2.29

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.61

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

0.69

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.64

-0.86

Drawdowns

YINN vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YINNSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.87%

-59.35%

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.74%

-18.19%

-29.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.08%

-35.18%

-33.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-46.59%

-49.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

-59.35%

-39.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.46%

-0.58%

-96.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.48%

-9.50%

-58.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.39%

4.12%

+20.27%

Volatility

YINN vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 21.19% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.60%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YINNSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.19%

5.60%

+15.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.60%

18.10%

+24.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.73%

23.88%

+34.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.19%

33.46%

+60.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.78%

35.76%

+46.02%

YINN vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

YINN vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SPUU's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.33%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.39%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YINN and SPUU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (21.19%) compared to SPUU (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.74% vs -19.13% for YINN. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.74% return vs -19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.33% for SPUU.

YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.64% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YINN and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer