YINN vs. ISVBF
YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%) while ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, YINN returned -38.06%/yr vs -5.34%/yr for ISVBF. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISVBF.
Performance
YINN vs. ISVBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -35.64% return, which is significantly lower than ISVBF's -8.71% return.
YINN
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- -8.89%
- 6M
- -42.95%
- YTD
- -35.64%
- 1Y
- -36.89%
- 3Y*
- -8.66%
- 5Y*
- -38.06%
- 10Y*
- -20.77%
ISVBF
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- 6M
- -13.00%
- YTD
- -8.71%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- -5.34%
- 10Y*
- —
YINN vs. ISVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -35.64% | 54.21% | 36.06% | -53.08% | -71.97% | -53.22% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -8.71% | 30.64% | 18.96% | -9.28% | -23.01% | -22.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between YINN and ISVBF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, YINN and ISVBF have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YINN vs. ISVBF — Risk / Return Rank
YINN
ISVBF
YINN vs. ISVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YINN | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.02 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.04 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -0.10 | -1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YINN vs. ISVBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than ISVBF's maximum drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and ISVBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YINN | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.87% | -53.78% | -45.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.64% | -24.14% | -37.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.08% | -24.14% | -44.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.48% | -52.51% | -42.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.72% | -26.01% | -71.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -32.64% | -36.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.24% | 10.49% | +19.75% |
Volatility
YINN vs. ISVBF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 18.79% compared to iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) at 7.72%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISVBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YINN | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.79% | 7.72% | +11.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.66% | 27.02% | +15.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.57% | 31.48% | +28.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.21% | 30.46% | +63.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.55% | 30.13% | +51.42% |
YINN vs. ISVBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVBF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
YINN vs. ISVBF - Dividend Comparison
YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.39% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YINN and ISVBF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YINN has higher volatility (18.79%) compared to ISVBF (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs ISVBF's -53.78%.
On 5-year performance, ISVBF leads with -5.34% vs -38.06% for YINN. On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ISVBF has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISVBF has performed better with a -5.34% return vs -38.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.
YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.40% for ISVBF.
ISVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YINN and ISVBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer