PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YELP vs. PYPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YELP vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yelp Inc. (YELP) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with YELP having a -24.09% return and PYPL slightly higher at -23.49%. Over the past 10 years, YELP has underperformed PYPL with an annualized return of -1.42%, while PYPL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.56% annualized return.


YELP

1D
-1.66%
1M
-20.17%
YTD
-24.09%
6M
-22.11%
1Y
-37.90%
3Y*
-12.25%
5Y*
-10.05%
10Y*
-1.42%

PYPL

1D
-1.46%
1M
-11.72%
YTD
-23.49%
6M
-28.99%
1Y
-36.88%
3Y*
-11.21%
5Y*
-29.54%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YELP vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YELP
Yelp Inc.
-24.09%-21.47%-18.25%73.15%-24.56%10.93%-6.20%-0.46%-16.61%10.04%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
-23.49%-31.44%38.98%-13.77%-62.23%-19.48%116.51%28.64%14.22%86.52%

Correlation

The correlation between YELP and PYPL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2015

0.40

The correlation between YELP and PYPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YELP:

$1.37B

PYPL:

$40.97B

EPS

YELP:

$2.20

PYPL:

$5.31

PE Ratio

YELP:

10.50

PYPL:

8.39

PEG Ratio

YELP:

0.18

PYPL:

0.41

PS Ratio

YELP:

0.99

PYPL:

1.26

PB Ratio

YELP:

2.17

PYPL:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

YELP:

$1.47B

PYPL:

$33.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YELP:

$1.32B

PYPL:

$15.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

YELP:

$252.66M

PYPL:

$7.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YELP vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YELP
YELP Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YELP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YELP Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
YELP Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
YELP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
YELP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PYPL
PYPL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PYPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YELP vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yelp Inc. (YELP) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YELPPYPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.99

-0.95

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.33

-1.18

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.73

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.64

-1.33

-0.31

YELP vs. PYPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YELP Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is comparable to the PYPL Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YELP and PYPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YELPPYPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

-0.95

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

-0.71

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.04

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.02

-0.03

Drawdowns

YELP vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YELP drawdown since its inception was -85.25%, roughly equal to the maximum PYPL drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YELP and PYPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YELPPYPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.25%

-87.30%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.25%

-49.92%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.16%

-57.34%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.16%

-87.30%

+28.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.23%

-87.30%

+15.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.47%

-85.49%

+9.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-35.61%

-19.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.12%

27.38%

-3.26%

Volatility

YELP vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison

Yelp Inc. (YELP) has a higher volatility of 16.98% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 8.86%. This indicates that YELP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YELPPYPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.98%

8.86%

+8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.60%

31.36%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.44%

38.82%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.74%

42.04%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.87%

38.75%

+7.12%

Dividends

YELP vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison

YELP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM2025
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.63%0.24%
YELP
Yelp Inc.
0.00%0.00%

Financials

YELP vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yelp Inc. and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
361.46M
8.35B
(YELP) Total Revenue
(PYPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YELP vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Yelp Inc. and PayPal Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
89.4%
45.6%
Portfolio components
YELP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported a gross profit of 323.05M and revenue of 361.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.4%.

PYPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.

YELP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported an operating income of 27.30M and revenue of 361.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

PYPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

YELP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported a net income of 17.74M and revenue of 361.46M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

PYPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YELP and PYPL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YELP has higher volatility (16.98%) compared to PYPL (8.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YELP dropped -85.25% vs PYPL's -87.30%.

PYPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YELP and PYPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer