YELP vs. GTLB
YELP (Yelp Inc.) and GTLB (GitLab Inc.) are both stocks. YELP operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while GTLB operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, YELP returned -13.60%/yr vs -2.85%/yr for GTLB. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
YELP vs. GTLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YELP achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than GTLB's -17.59% return.
YELP
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -23.19%
- YTD
- -27.54%
- 6M
- -26.92%
- 1Y
- -41.28%
- 3Y*
- -13.60%
- 5Y*
- -10.80%
- 10Y*
- -1.88%
GTLB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 25.78%
- YTD
- -17.59%
- 6M
- -18.24%
- 1Y
- -33.73%
- 3Y*
- -2.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YELP vs. GTLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YELP Yelp Inc. | -27.54% | -21.47% | -18.25% | 73.15% | -24.56% | -8.81% |
GTLB GitLab Inc. | -17.59% | -33.40% | -10.50% | 38.56% | -47.77% | -16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between YELP and GTLB is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021 | 0.44 |
Fundamentals
YELP:
$1.31B
GTLB:
$5.26B
YELP:
$2.20
GTLB:
-$0.15
YELP:
0.95
GTLB:
5.14
YELP:
2.07
GTLB:
5.34
YELP:
$1.47B
GTLB:
$1.00B
YELP:
$1.32B
GTLB:
$871.68M
YELP:
$252.66M
GTLB:
-$42.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YELP vs. GTLB — Risk / Return Rank
YELP
GTLB
YELP vs. GTLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yelp Inc. (YELP) and GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YELP | GTLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.93 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.55 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | -1.03 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YELP | GTLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.07 | -0.57 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.31 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
YELP vs. GTLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YELP drawdown since its inception was -85.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GTLB drawdown of -85.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YELP and GTLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YELP | GTLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.25% | -85.16% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.18% | -61.95% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.16% | -74.97% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.54% | -76.37% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.60% | -60.99% | +5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.26% | 32.70% | -8.44% |
Volatility
YELP vs. GTLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Yelp Inc. (YELP) is 17.35%, while GitLab Inc. (GTLB) has a volatility of 23.66%. This indicates that YELP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YELP | GTLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.35% | 23.66% | -6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.93% | 46.79% | -16.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.61% | 59.00% | -20.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.80% | 74.62% | -37.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.89% | 74.62% | -28.73% |
Dividends
YELP vs. GTLB - Dividend Comparison
Neither YELP nor GTLB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
YELP vs. GTLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yelp Inc. and GitLab Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
YELP vs. GTLB - Profitability Comparison
YELP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported a gross profit of 323.05M and revenue of 361.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.4%.
GTLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.67M and revenue of 264.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.8%.
YELP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported an operating income of 27.30M and revenue of 361.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
GTLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported an operating income of -15.75M and revenue of 264.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.
YELP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported a net income of 17.74M and revenue of 361.46M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.
GTLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GitLab Inc. reported a net income of -4.97M and revenue of 264.16M, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
YELP and GTLB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTLB has higher volatility (23.66%) compared to YELP (17.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YELP dropped -85.25% vs GTLB's -85.16%.
GTLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YELP and GTLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer