PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YELP vs. GMAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YELP vs. GMAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yelp Inc. (YELP) and Genmab A/S (GMAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YELP achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than GMAB's -22.47% return. Over the past 10 years, YELP has underperformed GMAB with an annualized return of -1.88%, while GMAB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.42% annualized return.


YELP

1D
-4.55%
1M
-23.19%
YTD
-27.54%
6M
-26.92%
1Y
-41.28%
3Y*
-13.60%
5Y*
-10.80%
10Y*
-1.88%

GMAB

1D
0.13%
1M
-11.69%
YTD
-22.47%
6M
-24.62%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
-15.49%
5Y*
-10.22%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YELP vs. GMAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YELP
Yelp Inc.
-27.54%-21.47%-18.25%73.15%-24.56%10.93%-6.20%-0.46%-16.61%10.04%
GMAB
Genmab A/S
-22.47%47.58%-34.45%-24.87%7.13%-2.71%82.09%35.54%-0.61%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between YELP and GMAB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012

0.15

The correlation between YELP and GMAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YELP:

$1.31B

GMAB:

$15.25B

EPS

YELP:

$2.20

GMAB:

$4.10

PE Ratio

YELP:

10.03

GMAB:

5.83

PEG Ratio

YELP:

0.17

GMAB:

0.39

PS Ratio

YELP:

0.95

GMAB:

1.72

PB Ratio

YELP:

2.07

GMAB:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

YELP:

$1.47B

GMAB:

$8.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

YELP:

$1.32B

GMAB:

$8.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

YELP:

$252.66M

GMAB:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YELP vs. GMAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YELP
YELP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
YELP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YELP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YELP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
YELP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
YELP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAB
GMAB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GMAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YELP vs. GMAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yelp Inc. (YELP) and Genmab A/S (GMAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YELPGMABDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.07

0.35

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.49

0.71

-2.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.09

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

0.37

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.71

0.85

-2.56

YELP vs. GMAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YELP Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the GMAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YELP and GMAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YELPGMABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.07

0.35

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

-0.31

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

0.07

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.26

-0.28

Drawdowns

YELP vs. GMAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YELP drawdown since its inception was -85.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GMAB drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YELP and GMAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YELPGMABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.25%

-84.20%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.18%

-32.51%

-14.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.16%

-57.44%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.16%

-63.10%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.23%

-63.10%

-9.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.54%

-50.99%

-26.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.60%

-31.07%

-24.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.26%

14.03%

+10.23%

Volatility

YELP vs. GMAB - Volatility Comparison

Yelp Inc. (YELP) has a higher volatility of 17.35% compared to Genmab A/S (GMAB) at 11.99%. This indicates that YELP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YELPGMABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.35%

11.99%

+5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.93%

25.15%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.61%

34.23%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.80%

33.42%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.89%

35.23%

+10.66%

Dividends

YELP vs. GMAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither YELP nor GMAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

YELP vs. GMAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yelp Inc. and Genmab A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
361.46M
899.32M
(YELP) Total Revenue
(GMAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YELP vs. GMAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Yelp Inc. and Genmab A/S over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

90.0%92.0%94.0%96.0%98.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
89.4%
92.8%
Portfolio components
YELP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported a gross profit of 323.05M and revenue of 361.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.4%.

GMAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a gross profit of 834.08M and revenue of 899.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.8%.

YELP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported an operating income of 27.30M and revenue of 361.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

GMAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported an operating income of 225.83M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

YELP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yelp Inc. reported a net income of 17.74M and revenue of 361.46M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

GMAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YELP and GMAB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YELP has higher volatility (17.35%) compared to GMAB (11.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YELP dropped -85.25% vs GMAB's -84.20%.

GMAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YELP and GMAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer