PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YEAR vs. LOWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YEAR vs. LOWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YEAR achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than LOWV's 0.32% return.


YEAR

1D
0.06%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.41%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
10Y*

LOWV

1D
-0.08%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-0.63%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YEAR vs. LOWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
1.33%4.69%5.41%4.76%
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
0.32%12.26%20.43%18.90%

Correlation

The correlation between YEAR and LOWV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YEAR vs. LOWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YEAR
YEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
YEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
YEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
YEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
YEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LOWV
LOWV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
LOWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YEAR vs. LOWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YEARLOWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.08

1.12

+0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.94

0.74

+15.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

68.69

2.98

+65.71

YEAR vs. LOWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YEAR Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the LOWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YEAR and LOWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YEAR vs. LOWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YEAR drawdown since its inception was -0.64%, smaller than the maximum LOWV drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YEAR and LOWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YEARLOWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.64%

-13.87%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

-9.59%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.43%

-13.87%

+13.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.27%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-1.51%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

2.38%

-2.33%

Volatility

YEAR vs. LOWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) is 0.29%, while AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that YEAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YEARLOWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

2.68%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.54%

7.99%

-7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78%

10.46%

-9.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.15%

11.95%

-10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.15%

11.95%

-10.80%

YEAR vs. LOWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

YEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LOWV's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

YEAR vs. LOWV - Dividend Comparison

YEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than LOWV's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LOWV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
0.90%0.85%0.92%0.77%0.00%
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
4.14%4.33%5.16%5.00%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


YEAR and LOWV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOWV has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to YEAR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YEAR dropped -0.64% vs LOWV's -13.87%.

On 3-year performance, LOWV leads with 14.11% vs 4.98% for YEAR. On fees, YEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, YEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LOWV has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for LOWV.

YEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.90% for LOWV.

YEAR is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while LOWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for YEAR and 0.48% for LOWV.

YEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YEAR and LOWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer