LOWV vs. ^GSPC
LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 3 years, LOWV returned 15.49%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for ^GSPC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
LOWV vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return.
LOWV
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
LOWV vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 2.73% | 12.26% | 20.43% | 20.41% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 10.35% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 21.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOWV and ^GSPC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between LOWV and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOWV vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
LOWV
^GSPC
LOWV vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOWV | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 2.24 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 3.07 | -1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 2.93 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.65 | 13.52 | -8.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOWV | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.24 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.47 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
LOWV vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOWV | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -56.78% | +42.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -9.10% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | -18.90% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.74% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -10.72% | +9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 1.97% | +0.37% |
Volatility
LOWV vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is 2.17%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that LOWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOWV | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 2.93% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 8.99% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 11.89% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 16.90% | -4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 18.06% | -6.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOWV and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^GSPC has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to LOWV (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWV dropped -13.87% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOWV and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer