PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
YCS vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

YCS vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YCS returned 12.25%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for NLR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

YCS vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -1.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with YCS having a 12.25% annualized return and NLR not far ahead at 12.66%.

YCS

1D
0.35%
1M
5.12%
YTD
7.54%
6M
10.01%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
23.63%
10Y*
12.25%

NLR

1D
-7.19%
1M
-13.32%
YTD
-1.68%
6M
-7.41%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
31.57%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
12.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YCS vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		7.54%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		-1.68%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between YCS and NLR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008

0.04

The correlation between YCS and NLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort Yen

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

Often compared with YCS:
YCS vs. YCLYCS vs. JPYUSD=XYCS vs. PFIXYCS vs. TBTYCS vs. UUPYCS vs. BCSFYCS vs. SPY
Often compared with NLR:
NLR vs. URANLR vs. NUKZNLR vs. URNMNLR vs. OKLONLR vs. GRIDNLR vs. URANNLR vs. SMH

Return for Risk

YCS vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YCS vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

YCSNLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.00
0.66

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.54
1.17

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

1.10

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

2.21

+10.63

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YCS vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCS and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

YCSNLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

0.66

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.69

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.53

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.16

+0.17

Drawdowns

YCS vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and NLR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

YCSNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.56%

-65.05%

+15.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-25.80%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

-30.48%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-30.48%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

-34.35%

+7.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-25.71%

+25.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-35.71%

+15.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

12.78%

-10.13%

Volatility

YCS vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) is 1.56%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.51%. This indicates that YCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

YCSNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

13.51%

-11.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

33.53%

-21.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

42.92%

-25.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

29.41%

-8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

24.13%

-5.13%

YCS vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

YCS vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		2.59%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

YCS and NLR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.51%) compared to YCS (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 12.66% vs 12.25% for YCS. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 1.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

YCS is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for YCS and 0.56% for NLR.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCS and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer