YCL vs. BITU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

YCL (ProShares Ultra Yen) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YCL is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, YCL returned -18.77% vs -78.13% for BITU. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

YCL vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCL achieves a -5.82% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -58.54% return.

YCL

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.24%
• 6M: -7.85%
• YTD: -5.82%
• 1Y: -18.77%
• 3Y*: -13.30%
• 5Y*: -19.30%
• 10Y*: -13.42%
• ALL TIME*: -9.77%

BITU

• 1D: -5.81%
• 1M: 2.83%
• 6M: -53.44%
• YTD: -58.54%
• 1Y: -78.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -34.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	$38.79M	$39.32M	$47.38M
YCL ProShares Ultra Yen	$965.32K	$858.06K	$714.31K

YCL vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YCL ProShares Ultra Yen	-5.82%	-6.34%	-12.70%
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-58.54%	-37.07%	41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between YCL and BITU is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

YCL vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YCL

YCL Risk / Return Rank: 3
YCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YCL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
YCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YCL vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YCL	BITU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	-0.90	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	-1.79	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.80	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	-0.96	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	-1.34	+0.31

YCL vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCL Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCL and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YCL vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCL drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCL and BITU.

Drawdown Indicators

	YCL	BITU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.74%	-83.45%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.28%	-83.45%	+60.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.15%	-81.46%	-6.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.42%	-37.61%	-15.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.60%	59.30%	-44.70%

Volatility

YCL vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) is 5.60%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 17.90%. This indicates that YCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YCL	BITU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	17.90%	-12.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	67.92%	-56.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.66%	88.38%	-71.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	96.07%	-75.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.20%	96.07%	-77.87%

YCL vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YCL and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

YCL vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

YCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	82.40%	50.23%	0.12%
YCL ProShares Ultra Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YCL and BITU in my portfolio?

YCL and BITU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YCL or BITU?

BITU has higher volatility (17.90%) compared to YCL (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCL dropped -88.74% vs BITU's -83.45%.

Which ETF is better, YCL or BITU?

On 1-year performance, YCL leads with -18.77% vs -78.13% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YCL has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YCL or BITU?

Over the 1-year period, YCL has performed better with a -18.77% return vs -78.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YCL or BITU?

YCL and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YCL or BITU?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 82.40%, compared with 0.00% for YCL.

What is the main difference between YCL and BITU?

YCL is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. YCL tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.90 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.