YCL vs. BNKU
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU).
YCL and BNKU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YCL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. BNKU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 2, 2019. Both YCL and BNKU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
YCL vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YCL vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YCL ProShares Ultra Yen | -3.59% | -13.85% |
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | -21.78% | 46.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YCL achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly higher than BNKU's -21.78% return.
YCL
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- YTD
- -3.59%
- 6M
- -15.53%
- 1Y
- -16.05%
- 3Y*
- -17.74%
- 5Y*
- -18.74%
- 10Y*
- -11.45%
BNKU
- 1D
- 10.05%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -21.78%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 63.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YCL vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YCL and BNKU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
YCL vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank
YCL
BNKU
YCL vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YCL | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | 0.86 | -1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | 1.44 | -2.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.22 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.66 | -2.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 4.49 | -5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YCL | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 0.86 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.17 | -0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between YCL and BNKU is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
YCL vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison
Neither YCL nor BNKU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
YCL vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YCL drawdown since its inception was -88.10%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCL and BNKU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YCL | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.10% | -58.03% | -30.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.44% | -41.95% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.87% | -33.69% | -54.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.76% | -15.99% | -36.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.82% | 15.46% | +1.36% |
Volatility
YCL vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) is 4.83%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) has a volatility of 18.30%. This indicates that YCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YCL | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 18.30% | -13.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 46.11% | -33.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 73.78% | -53.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 75.73% | -55.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 75.73% | -56.88% |