PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCL vs. EWJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCL vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCL achieves a -7.76% return, which is significantly lower than EWJ's 20.75% return. Over the past 10 years, YCL has underperformed EWJ with an annualized return of -13.39%, while EWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


YCL

1D
-0.49%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
-7.76%
6M
-7.91%
1Y
-22.35%
3Y*
-14.02%
5Y*
-19.29%
10Y*
-13.39%

EWJ

1D
0.74%
1M
6.43%
YTD
20.75%
6M
21.17%
1Y
40.95%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YCL vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YCL
ProShares Ultra Yen
-7.76%-6.34%-25.97%-20.46%-26.92%-20.94%7.16%-2.99%0.17%3.48%
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
20.75%25.84%7.03%20.29%-17.72%1.16%15.40%19.34%-14.10%24.27%

Correlation

The correlation between YCL and EWJ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2008

-0.02

The correlation between YCL and EWJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YCL vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YCL
YCL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
YCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
YCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EWJ
EWJ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YCL vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCLEWJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.37

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

3.03

-3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

10.19

-11.57

YCL vs. EWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCL Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the EWJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCL and EWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCL vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCL drawdown since its inception was -88.39%, which is greater than EWJ's maximum drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCL and EWJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCLEWJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.39%

-60.93%

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.74%

-13.59%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.14%

-14.68%

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

-33.14%

-33.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.19%

-33.14%

-44.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.39%

0.00%

-88.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.20%

-21.71%

-31.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.31%

4.03%

+12.28%

Volatility

YCL vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Yen (YCL) is 1.29%, while iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that YCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCLEWJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

6.48%

-5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

16.02%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

20.26%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

18.40%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

17.33%

+1.24%

YCL vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

YCL vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison

YCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
3.67%4.52%2.34%2.03%1.23%2.08%1.04%2.03%1.71%1.25%1.95%1.27%
YCL
ProShares Ultra Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YCL and EWJ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWJ has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to YCL (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCL dropped -88.39% vs EWJ's -60.93%.

On 10-year performance, EWJ leads with 10.06% vs -13.39% for YCL. On fees, EWJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, YCL has been the lower-risk option at 1.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWJ has performed better with a 10.06% return vs -13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YCL.

EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.00% for YCL.

YCL is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while EWJ is Japan Equities. YCL tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YCL and 0.49% for EWJ.

EWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCL and EWJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer