PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
YBTY vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

YBTY vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

YBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. YBTY is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. YBTY charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

YBTY vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTY achieves a -24.66% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 12.29% return.

YBTY

1D
-0.56%
1M
-5.44%
6M
-20.86%
YTD
-24.66%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

RYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.19%
6M
10.16%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
$10.07M$9.36M$9.08M

YBTY

GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF
$43.99K$66.73K$58.36K

YBTY vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
YBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF		-24.66%-7.56%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF		12.29%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTY and RYLD is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.71

YBTY vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
YBTY
RYLD

Financial Services

96.0%
17.8%

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.6%

Energy

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

20.3%

Industrials

-

14.1%

Real Estate

-

6.8%

Technology

-

14.5%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Financial Services

YBTY
96.0%
RYLD
17.8%

Basic Materials

YBTY

-

RYLD
4.4%

Communication Services

YBTY

-

RYLD
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

YBTY

-

RYLD
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

YBTY

-

RYLD
2.6%

Energy

YBTY

-

RYLD
5.5%

Healthcare

YBTY

-

RYLD
20.3%

Industrials

YBTY

-

RYLD
14.1%

Real Estate

YBTY

-

RYLD
6.8%

Technology

YBTY

-

RYLD
14.5%

Utilities

YBTY

-

RYLD
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with YBTY:
YBTY vs. AMDWYBTY vs. DHSBYBTY vs. ARMWYBTY vs. BARYBTY vs. BUCKYBTY vs. GOOYYBTY vs. AMDL
Often compared with RYLD:
RYLD vs. QYLDRYLD vs. XYLDRYLD vs. JEPIRYLD vs. IWMRYLD vs. SVOLRYLD vs. SCHDRYLD vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

YBTY vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
YBTY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YBTY vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF (YBTY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

YBTYRYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

2.17

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

3.05

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.45

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.67

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

15.02

—

YBTY vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YBTY vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTY drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTY and RYLD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

YBTYRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-41.53%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-6.29%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-19.05%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-21.33%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.55%

-0.37%

-31.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.62%

-8.65%

-11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

1.54%

—

Volatility

YBTY vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

YBTYRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

2.07%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

7.73%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

10.67%

+9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

13.97%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

17.04%

+3.15%

YBTY vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTY has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBTY vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

YBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.07%, more than RYLD's 11.62% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF		11.62%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%
YBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TopYielders ETF		69.07%4.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

YBTY and RYLD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBTY.

YBTY has the higher dividend yield at 69.07%, compared with 11.62% for RYLD.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBTY and 0.60% for RYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBTY and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer