PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBST vs. FBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBST vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Single Stock Universe ETF (YBST) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBST achieves a -17.01% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -35.56% return.


YBST

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
-17.01%
6M
-21.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBL

1D
-0.57%
1M
-17.03%
YTD
-35.56%
6M
-36.69%
1Y
-48.06%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBST vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YBST and FBL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.41

YBST vs. FBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YBST
FBL

Financial Services

97.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

66.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

YBST
97.0%
FBL

-

Basic Materials

YBST

-

FBL

-

Communication Services

YBST

-

FBL
66.7%

Consumer Cyclical

YBST

-

FBL

-

Consumer Defensive

YBST

-

FBL

-

Energy

YBST

-

FBL

-

Healthcare

YBST

-

FBL

-

Industrials

YBST

-

FBL

-

Real Estate

YBST

-

FBL

-

Technology

YBST

-

FBL

-

Utilities

YBST

-

FBL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBST vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBST

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FBL
FBL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBST vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Single Stock Universe ETF (YBST) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YBSTFBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

YBST vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YBST vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBST drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBST and FBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBSTFBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-61.15%

+36.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.97%

-58.24%

+36.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-16.96%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.05%

Volatility

YBST vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBSTFBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.27%

72.38%

-55.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

71.35%

-54.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

71.35%

-54.08%

YBST vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBST has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBST vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

YBST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.47%, more than FBL's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
3.22%2.07%0.00%51.58%
YBST
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Single Stock Universe ETF
45.47%3.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YBST and FBL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for YBST.

YBST has the higher dividend yield at 45.47%, compared with 3.22% for FBL.

YBST is categorized as Derivative Income, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.38% for YBST and 1.15% for FBL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBST and FBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer