XYZY vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XYZY (YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XYZY is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, XYZY returned 0.13% vs 24.93% for RYLD. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XYZY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

XYZY vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XYZY having a 12.33% return and RYLD slightly lower at 12.29%.

XYZY

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 3.92%
• 6M: 21.38%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 1Y: 0.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.57%

RYLD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 10.16%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.93%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$10.07M	$9.36M	$9.08M
XYZY YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF	$283.87K	$283.65K	$420.24K

XYZY vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XYZY YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF	12.33%	-29.43%	21.72%	44.46%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	12.29%	5.65%	10.13%	1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZY and RYLD is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023	0.53

The correlation between XYZY and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XYZY vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XYZY

XYZY Risk / Return Rank: 10
XYZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XYZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XYZY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XYZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XYZY Martin Ratio Rank: 9

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 90
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XYZY vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XYZY	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	2.17	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	3.05	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.45	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	3.67	-3.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.20	15.02	-15.22

XYZY vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZY Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZY and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XYZY vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZY and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYZY	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.30%	-41.53%	-10.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.72%	-6.29%	-31.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.47%	-0.37%	-29.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.44%	-8.65%	-13.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.95%	1.54%	+16.41%

Volatility

XYZY vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.07%. This indicates that XYZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYZY	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	2.07%	+4.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.26%	7.73%	+22.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.84%	10.67%	+28.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.58%	13.97%	+27.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.58%	17.04%	+24.54%

XYZY vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XYZY vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

XYZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.39%, more than RYLD's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.62%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%
XYZY YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF	78.39%	95.35%	62.54%	9.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYZY and RYLD in my portfolio?

XYZY and RYLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYZY or RYLD?

XYZY has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to RYLD (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZY dropped -52.30% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, XYZY or RYLD?

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 24.93% vs 0.13% for XYZY. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XYZY or RYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 24.93% return vs 0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYZY or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XYZY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XYZY or RYLD?

XYZY has the higher dividend yield at 78.39%, compared with 11.62% for RYLD.

What is the main difference between XYZY and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XYZY and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.