XYZG vs. ROBN
XYZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF) and ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XYZG returned -15.62% vs -29.65% for ROBN. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XYZG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for ROBN.
Performance
XYZG vs. ROBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly higher than ROBN's -60.08% return.
XYZG
- 1D
- -11.57%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- -15.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBN
- 1D
- -12.05%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- YTD
- -60.08%
- 6M
- -72.54%
- 1Y
- -29.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYZG vs. ROBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF | -3.28% | 21.85% |
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | -60.08% | 571.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYZG and ROBN is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XYZG and ROBN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYZG vs. ROBN — Risk / Return Rank
XYZG
ROBN
XYZG vs. ROBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYZG | ROBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.08 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.34 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -0.56 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYZG | ROBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | -0.22 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.03 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
XYZG vs. ROBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, smaller than the maximum ROBN drawdown of -86.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and ROBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYZG | ROBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -86.84% | +17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.40% | -86.84% | +17.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.04% | -81.36% | +36.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -43.20% | +14.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.60% | 53.11% | -15.51% |
Volatility
XYZG vs. ROBN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) is 25.78%, while T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a volatility of 41.47%. This indicates that XYZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYZG | ROBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.78% | 41.47% | -15.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.80% | 101.22% | -30.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.87% | 137.84% | -44.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.71% | 152.35% | -48.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.71% | 152.35% | -48.64% |
XYZG vs. ROBN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYZG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBN's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYZG vs. ROBN - Dividend Comparison
XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than ROBN's 11.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | 11.22% | 4.48% |
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF | 6.92% | 6.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYZG and ROBN have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBN has higher volatility (41.47%) compared to XYZG (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs ROBN's -86.84%.
On 1-year performance, XYZG leads with -15.62% vs -29.65% for ROBN. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XYZG has performed better with a -15.62% return vs -29.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.
ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 6.92% for XYZG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XYZG and 1.05% for ROBN.
XYZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYZG and ROBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer