XYZG vs. ROBN

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

XYZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF) and ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XYZG returned 6.27% vs -29.71% for ROBN. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XYZG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for ROBN.

Performance

XYZG vs. ROBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a 27.43% return, which is significantly higher than ROBN's -27.36% return.

XYZG

• 1D: 4.38%
• 1M: 18.91%
• 6M: 27.30%
• YTD: 27.43%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROBN

• 1D: 4.19%
• 1M: 32.51%
• 6M: -34.60%
• YTD: -27.36%
• 1Y: -29.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZG vs. ROBN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	27.43%	21.76%
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	-27.36%	438.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZG and ROBN is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.54

The correlation between XYZG and ROBN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XYZG vs. ROBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZG

XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 13
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

ROBN

ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 10
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZG vs. ROBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XYZG	ROBN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	-0.21	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	0.65	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.08	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	-0.34	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.16	-0.51	+0.67

XYZG vs. ROBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZG Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the ROBN Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZG and ROBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XYZG vs. ROBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, smaller than the maximum ROBN drawdown of -86.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and ROBN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYZG	ROBN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.40%	-86.84%	+17.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.40%	-86.84%	+17.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.59%	-66.08%	+38.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.81%	-45.38%	+15.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.76%	58.38%	-18.62%

Volatility

XYZG vs. ROBN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) is 22.53%, while T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a volatility of 37.14%. This indicates that XYZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYZG	ROBN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.53%	37.14%	-14.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.34%	105.20%	-32.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	93.42%	138.91%	-45.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.77%	150.94%	-49.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.77%	150.94%	-49.17%

XYZG vs. ROBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBN's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

XYZG vs. ROBN - Dividend Comparison

XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than ROBN's 6.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	6.17%	4.48%
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	5.25%	6.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYZG and ROBN in my portfolio?

XYZG and ROBN have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYZG or ROBN?

ROBN has higher volatility (37.14%) compared to XYZG (22.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs ROBN's -86.84%.

Which ETF is better, XYZG or ROBN?

On 1-year performance, XYZG leads with 6.27% vs -29.71% for ROBN. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 22.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XYZG or ROBN?

Over the 1-year period, XYZG has performed better with a 6.27% return vs -29.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYZG or ROBN?

XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XYZG or ROBN?

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 5.25% for XYZG.

What is the main difference between XYZG and ROBN?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XYZG and 1.05% for ROBN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.