PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYZG vs. AIBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYZG vs. AIBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than AIBU's 30.76% return.


XYZG

1D
0.78%
1M
8.97%
YTD
8.00%
6M
8.93%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIBU

1D
-3.41%
1M
6.39%
YTD
30.76%
6M
30.54%
1Y
72.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZG vs. AIBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XYZG and AIBU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.55

The correlation between XYZG and AIBU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYZG vs. AIBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZG
XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZG vs. AIBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYZGAIBUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

1.50

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.22

3.62

-3.84

XYZG vs. AIBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZG Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the AIBU Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZG and AIBU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYZG vs. AIBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, which is greater than AIBU's maximum drawdown of -51.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and AIBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYZGAIBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.40%

-51.17%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.40%

-48.71%

-20.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.63%

-15.52%

-23.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-13.77%

-15.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.54%

20.15%

+18.39%

Volatility

XYZG vs. AIBU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) has a higher volatility of 27.64% compared to Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) at 20.41%. This indicates that XYZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIBU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYZGAIBUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.64%

20.41%

+7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.18%

39.60%

+31.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.07%

50.02%

+44.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

103.45%

55.94%

+47.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.45%

55.94%

+47.51%

XYZG vs. AIBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AIBU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYZG vs. AIBU - Dividend Comparison

XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than AIBU's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIBU
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares
1.71%2.27%1.33%
XYZG
Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF
6.20%6.69%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYZG and AIBU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYZG has higher volatility (27.64%) compared to AIBU (20.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs AIBU's -51.17%.

On 1-year performance, AIBU leads with 72.63% vs -8.48% for XYZG. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AIBU has been the lower-risk option at 20.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIBU has performed better with a 72.63% return vs -8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.

XYZG has the higher dividend yield at 6.20%, compared with 1.71% for AIBU.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XYZG and 0.96% for AIBU.

AIBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYZG and AIBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer