XYZG vs. ASMG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

XYZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF) and ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XYZG returned -15.75% vs 307.23% for ASMG. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

XYZG vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a 24.19% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 86.81% return.

XYZG

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: 4.67%
• 6M: 47.67%
• YTD: 24.19%
• 1Y: -15.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 36.72%

ASMG

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: -17.29%
• 6M: 9.24%
• YTD: 86.81%
• 1Y: 307.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 105.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	$3.03M	$5.30M	$5.99M
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	$166.11K	$170.95K	$187.53K

XYZG vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	24.19%	21.76%
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	86.81%	142.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZG and ASMG is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

XYZG vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XYZG

XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 9
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ASMG

ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XYZG vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XYZG	ASMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	3.29	-3.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	3.13	-2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.38	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	7.35	-7.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	22.78	-23.36

XYZG vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZG Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the ASMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZG and ASMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XYZG vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and ASMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYZG	ASMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.40%	-43.95%	-25.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.73%	-41.10%	-27.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.43%	-35.29%	+5.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.85%	-13.54%	-16.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.11%	13.24%	+25.87%

Volatility

XYZG vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) is 17.56%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a volatility of 29.36%. This indicates that XYZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYZG	ASMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.56%	29.36%	-11.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	71.33%	74.68%	-3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.12%	92.16%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	100.74%	89.81%	+10.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.74%	89.81%	+10.93%

XYZG vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XYZG and ASMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

XYZG vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than ASMG's 6.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	6.00%	11.20%
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	5.39%	6.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYZG and ASMG in my portfolio?

XYZG and ASMG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYZG or ASMG?

ASMG has higher volatility (29.36%) compared to XYZG (17.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs ASMG's -43.95%.

Which ETF is better, XYZG or ASMG?

On 1-year performance, ASMG leads with 307.23% vs -15.75% for XYZG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 17.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XYZG or ASMG?

Over the 1-year period, ASMG has performed better with a 307.23% return vs -15.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYZG or ASMG?

XYZG and ASMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XYZG or ASMG?

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.00%, compared with 5.39% for XYZG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.