XYZG vs. BIS
XYZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF) and BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XYZG is actively managed, while BIS is passively managed. Over the past year, XYZG returned -15.62% vs -49.58% for BIS. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. XYZG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BIS.
Performance
XYZG vs. BIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly higher than BIS's -6.36% return.
XYZG
- 1D
- -11.57%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- -15.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIS
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- -6.36%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- -49.58%
- 3Y*
- -21.43%
- 5Y*
- -14.49%
- 10Y*
- -23.34%
XYZG vs. BIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF | -3.28% | 21.85% |
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -6.36% | -55.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYZG and BIS is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYZG vs. BIS — Risk / Return Rank
XYZG
BIS
XYZG vs. BIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYZG | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.78 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.91 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -1.25 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYZG | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | -1.25 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.67 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
XYZG vs. BIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, smaller than the maximum BIS drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and BIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYZG | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -99.87% | +30.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.40% | -54.50% | -14.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -66.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.04% | -99.85% | +54.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -90.03% | +60.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.60% | 39.59% | -1.99% |
Volatility
XYZG vs. BIS - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) has a higher volatility of 25.78% compared to ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) at 13.87%. This indicates that XYZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYZG | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.78% | 13.87% | +11.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.80% | 30.95% | +39.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.87% | 39.68% | +53.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.71% | 43.74% | +59.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.71% | 46.36% | +57.35% |
XYZG vs. BIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYZG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BIS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYZG vs. BIS - Dividend Comparison
XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than BIS's 4.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 4.92% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% |
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF | 6.92% | 6.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYZG and BIS have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XYZG has higher volatility (25.78%) compared to BIS (13.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs BIS's -99.87%.
On 1-year performance, XYZG leads with -15.62% vs -49.58% for BIS. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BIS has been the lower-risk option at 13.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XYZG has performed better with a -15.62% return vs -49.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIS.
XYZG has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 4.92% for BIS.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XYZG and 0.95% for BIS.
XYZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYZG and BIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer