BIS vs. NDAQ
BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%), while NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BIS returned -25.72%/yr vs 16.49%/yr for NDAQ. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BIS vs. NDAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIS achieves a -29.18% return, which is significantly lower than NDAQ's -8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BIS has underperformed NDAQ with an annualized return of -25.72%, while NDAQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.49% annualized return.
BIS
- 1D
- 5.01%
- 1M
- -20.61%
- 6M
- -26.01%
- YTD
- -29.18%
- 1Y
- -57.69%
- 3Y*
- -29.62%
- 5Y*
- -16.93%
- 10Y*
- -25.72%
NDAQ
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 16.49%
BIS vs. NDAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -29.18% | -45.95% | 4.79% | -6.54% | -2.14% | -14.74% | -56.01% | -41.01% | 5.14% | -36.98% |
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | -8.70% | 27.19% | 34.85% | -3.66% | -11.19% | 60.13% | 25.99% | 33.88% | 8.21% | 16.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIS and NDAQ is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010 | -0.40 |
The correlation between BIS and NDAQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.42 (5 years) to -0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIS vs. NDAQ — Risk / Return Rank
BIS
NDAQ
BIS vs. NDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIS | NDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.01 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.07 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -0.16 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIS vs. NDAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIS drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than NDAQ's maximum drawdown of -68.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIS and NDAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIS | NDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -68.48% | -31.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.93% | -23.39% | -37.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.96% | -23.39% | -50.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.19% | -32.84% | -47.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.82% | -38.31% | -57.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.89% | -12.18% | -87.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.07% | -23.78% | -66.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.80% | 10.55% | +28.25% |
Volatility
BIS vs. NDAQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) have volatilities of 12.76% and 12.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIS | NDAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.76% | 12.98% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.24% | 23.66% | +8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.01% | 27.23% | +13.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.96% | 24.51% | +19.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.19% | 24.51% | +21.68% |
Dividends
BIS vs. NDAQ - Dividend Comparison
BIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, more than NDAQ's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 5.96% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 1.27% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.00% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.08% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIS and NDAQ have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDAQ has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to BIS (12.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIS dropped -99.89% vs NDAQ's -68.48%.
NDAQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIS and NDAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer