XYLU.L vs. BUCK
XYLU.L (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLU.L is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. XYLU.L is passively managed, while BUCK is actively managed. Over the past year, XYLU.L returned 18.07% vs 7.46% for BUCK. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
XYLU.L vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLU.L achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.99% return.
XYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLU.L vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | 5.28% | 7.85% | 19.71% | 0.64% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.99% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLU.L and BUCK is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2023 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLU.L vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
XYLU.L
BUCK
XYLU.L vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLU.L | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.51 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 5.73 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.28 | 30.33 | -12.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLU.L | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.42 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 1.48 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
XYLU.L vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLU.L | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -5.43% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | -1.31% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -0.49% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.25% | +0.74% |
Volatility
XYLU.L vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that XYLU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLU.L | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 0.70% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | 1.52% | +3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 3.14% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 3.48% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 3.48% | +6.96% |
XYLU.L vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLU.L vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%, more than BUCK's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.41% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | 10.27% | 10.48% | 8.49% | 3.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLU.L and BUCK have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XYLU.L.
XYLU.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XYLU.L and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for XYLU.L and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer