XYLU.L vs. SDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV).
XYLU.L and SDIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLU.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023. SDIV is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. It was launched on Jun 8, 2011. Both XYLU.L and SDIV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XYLU.L vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XYLU.L vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | -2.53% | 7.85% | 19.71% | 0.64% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 6.70% | 29.12% | 1.77% | 4.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLU.L achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than SDIV's 6.70% return.
XYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -2.53%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 10.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDIV
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 32.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 0.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XYLU.L vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XYLU.L vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank
XYLU.L
SDIV
XYLU.L vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLU.L | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 2.07 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.66 | -1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.43 | -1.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 12.21 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLU.L | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.07 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.06 | +0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLU.L and SDIV is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XYLU.L vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison
XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than SDIV's 9.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | 10.86% | 10.48% | 8.49% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 9.10% | 9.59% | 11.33% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.73% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% |
Drawdowns
XYLU.L vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and SDIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLU.L | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -56.90% | +39.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -13.37% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.47% | -17.21% | +12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -18.63% | +16.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.66% | -0.97% |
Volatility
XYLU.L vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) is 3.39%, while Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that XYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XYLU.L | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 6.25% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.61% | 9.21% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 16.03% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 16.79% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 18.96% | -8.34% |