XYLG vs. XOMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO).
XYLG and XOMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020. XOMO is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Aug 30, 2023.
Performance
XYLG vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XYLG vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | -2.15% | 12.93% | 22.31% | 3.38% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 23.45% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.
XYLG
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 14.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- -4.29%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XYLG vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XYLG vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
XYLG
XOMO
XYLG vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLG | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 3.35 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLG | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.55 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLG and XOMO is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XYLG vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.65%, less than XOMO's 30.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 14.65% | 13.94% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.43% | 7.40% | 1.39% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XYLG vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and XOMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLG | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -18.90% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -15.24% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -5.12% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -7.05% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 6.69% | -4.61% |
Volatility
XYLG vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is 4.85%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that XYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XYLG | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 6.57% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 13.81% | -6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 22.02% | -5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 18.46% | -4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 18.46% | -4.48% |