XYLG vs. JEPI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XYLG (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLG is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index, while JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan. XYLG is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XYLG returned 10.07%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for JEPI. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

XYLG vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 0.91% return.

XYLG

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 5.87%
• 1Y: 19.67%
• 3Y*: 15.97%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: —

JEPI

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 0.64%
• 1Y: 7.76%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLG vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF	6.31%	12.93%	22.31%	18.16%	-15.46%	23.81%	12.13%
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF	0.91%	8.09%	12.57%	9.83%	-3.49%	21.52%	9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLG and JEPI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020	0.75

The correlation between XYLG and JEPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XYLG vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XYLG	JEPI
Technology	39.2%	15.3%
Financial Services	11.6%	7.2%
Communication Services	10.2%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	11.6%
Industrials	7.9%	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	7.8%
Energy	3.1%	2.5%
Utilities	2.6%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%

Return for Risk

XYLG vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLG

XYLG Risk / Return Rank: 66
XYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
XYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

JEPI

JEPI Risk / Return Rank: 27
JEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
JEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
JEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
JEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
JEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLG vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XYLG	JEPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	0.97	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	1.45	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.18	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.17	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	3.44	+10.54

XYLG vs. JEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the JEPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLG and JEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XYLG vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and JEPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYLG	JEPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.30%	-13.71%	-7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-6.68%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.42%	-13.26%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.30%	-13.71%	-7.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-4.11%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-2.13%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	2.26%	-0.85%

Volatility

XYLG vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 2.38%. This indicates that XYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYLG	JEPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	2.38%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	6.29%	+1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	8.03%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.07%	11.08%	+2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	10.78%	+3.08%

XYLG vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XYLG and JEPI have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

XYLG vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison

XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.25%, more than JEPI's 8.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF	8.21%	8.25%	7.33%	8.40%	11.68%	6.59%	5.79%
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF	13.25%	13.94%	23.65%	4.90%	6.43%	7.40%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYLG and JEPI in my portfolio?

XYLG and JEPI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYLG or JEPI?

XYLG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to JEPI (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLG dropped -21.30% vs JEPI's -13.71%.

Which ETF is better, XYLG or JEPI?

On 5-year performance, XYLG leads with 10.07% vs 7.31% for JEPI. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XYLG or JEPI?

Over the 5-year period, XYLG has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYLG or JEPI?

XYLG and JEPI have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XYLG or JEPI?

XYLG has the higher dividend yield at 13.25%, compared with 8.21% for JEPI.

What is the main difference between XYLG and JEPI?

XYLG is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.