XYLG vs. QTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR).
XYLG and QTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both XYLG and QTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XYLG or QTR.
Correlation
The correlation between XYLG and QTR is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XYLG vs. QTR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XYLG:
0.56
QTR:
0.42
XYLG:
0.90
QTR:
0.70
XYLG:
1.14
QTR:
1.09
XYLG:
0.56
QTR:
0.42
XYLG:
2.49
QTR:
1.24
XYLG:
3.92%
QTR:
6.39%
XYLG:
17.50%
QTR:
18.77%
XYLG:
-21.30%
QTR:
-31.72%
XYLG:
-9.67%
QTR:
-14.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a -6.11% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's -9.57% return.
XYLG
-6.11%
-4.33%
-3.31%
8.71%
N/A
N/A
QTR
-9.57%
-4.74%
-6.44%
6.24%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XYLG vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XYLG and QTR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XYLG vs. QTR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XYLG
QTR
XYLG vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XYLG vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison
XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.21%, more than QTR's 0.55% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 26.21% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.44% | 7.40% | 1.39% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.37% | 1.90% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XYLG vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and QTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XYLG vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) at 9.78%. This indicates that XYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.