PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. PUTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XYLD

1D
0.53%
1M
2.36%
6M
6.99%
YTD
8.63%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
8.41%

PUTW

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.43M$34.54M$32.48M

XYLD vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
8.63%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%-2.80%17.19%14.01%-11.11%20.92%1.67%13.55%-8.07%9.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and PUTW is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.66

The correlation between XYLD and PUTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PUTW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XYLD vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLDPUTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.28

XYLD vs. PUTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDPUTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

Volatility

XYLD vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDPUTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

XYLD vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.47%, while PUTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%4.16%11.99%7.63%2.16%0.00%1.43%1.47%5.49%3.33%2.27%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.47%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and PUTW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PUTW is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PUTW is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.47%, compared with 0.00% for PUTW.

XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while PUTW tracks Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.44% for PUTW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and PUTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer