PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. PUTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than PUTW's 4.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XYLD having a 8.25% annualized return and PUTW not far ahead at 8.30%.


XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%

PUTW

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.94%
YTD
4.26%
6M
4.65%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
4.26%14.45%17.18%15.53%-10.11%20.94%1.65%13.55%-7.16%10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and PUTW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.72

The correlation between XYLD and PUTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XYLD vs. PUTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XYLD
PUTW

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
-0.0%

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XYLD
35.6%
PUTW

-

Financial Services

XYLD
11.8%
PUTW
-0.0%

Communication Services

XYLD
11.2%
PUTW

-

Consumer Cyclical

XYLD
10.2%
PUTW

-

Healthcare

XYLD
8.5%
PUTW

-

Industrials

XYLD
8.3%
PUTW

-

Consumer Defensive

XYLD
4.9%
PUTW

-

Energy

XYLD
3.5%
PUTW

-

Utilities

XYLD
2.3%
PUTW

-

Real Estate

XYLD
1.9%
PUTW

-

Basic Materials

XYLD
1.8%
PUTW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PUTW
PUTW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PUTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PUTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLDPUTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.43

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.65

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.84

12.69

+5.15

XYLD vs. PUTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the PUTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and PUTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLDPUTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.14

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.82

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.65

-0.05

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, which is greater than PUTW's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and PUTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDPUTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-28.40%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-7.15%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-15.26%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-16.56%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-28.40%

-5.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.27%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.44%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.49%

-0.50%

Volatility

XYLD vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) have volatilities of 0.88% and 0.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDPUTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

0.90%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

7.00%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

8.86%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.22%

12.13%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

13.22%

+0.99%

XYLD vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, less than PUTW's 12.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUTW
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.06%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and PUTW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUTW has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs PUTW's -28.40%.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and PUTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer