PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUTW vs. ADME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUTW vs. ADME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PUTW

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ADME

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.36%
6M
6.23%
YTD
7.79%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
8.52%
ALL TIME*
8.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$772.09K$556.48K$715.52K

PUTW vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%-2.80%17.19%14.01%-11.11%20.92%1.67%13.55%-8.07%9.88%
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
7.79%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%20.24%18.21%9.31%-6.05%17.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PUTW and ADME is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.64

The correlation between PUTW and ADME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUTW vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PUTW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PUTW vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUTWADMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

PUTW vs. ADME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUTW vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUTWADMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

PUTW vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUTWADMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

PUTW vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUTW has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than ADME's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUTW vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison

PUTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.36%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%
PUTW
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
0.00%4.16%11.99%7.63%2.16%0.00%1.43%1.47%5.49%3.33%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUTW and ADME have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PUTW is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PUTW is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.

ADME has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for PUTW.

PUTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while ADME is Equity Hedged. PUTW tracks Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index, while ADME tracks Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for PUTW and 0.79% for ADME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUTW and ADME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer