XYLD vs. KMI
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) is Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while KMI (Kinder Morgan, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XYLD returned 8.35%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for KMI. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XYLD vs. KMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than KMI's 18.40% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has underperformed KMI with an annualized return of 8.35%, while KMI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
KMI
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 29.74%
- 5Y*
- 17.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
XYLD vs. KMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.83% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 18.40% | 4.74% | 64.42% | 4.10% | 21.23% | 23.75% | -30.77% | 44.43% | -11.18% | -10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and KMI is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XYLD and KMI has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. KMI — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
KMI
XYLD vs. KMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLD | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.18 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.83 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.57 | 3.62 | +12.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. KMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum KMI drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and KMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -72.70% | +39.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -11.11% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -18.40% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | -20.31% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | -55.13% | +21.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -6.91% | +6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -32.06% | +28.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 5.60% | -4.59% |
Volatility
XYLD vs. KMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 2.17%, while Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 6.93% | -4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.71% | 14.66% | -8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.79% | 20.34% | -13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 22.61% | -11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 27.71% | -13.49% |
Dividends
XYLD vs. KMI - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than KMI's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 3.68% | 4.24% | 4.18% | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.76% | 7.59% | 4.49% | 4.71% | 2.77% | 2.41% | 12.94% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.53% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and KMI have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMI has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to XYLD (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs KMI's -72.70%.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and KMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer