PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMI vs. PAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMI vs. PAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMI achieves a 21.81% return, which is significantly lower than PAA's 24.45% return. Over the past 10 years, KMI has outperformed PAA with an annualized return of 11.73%, while PAA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.39% annualized return.


KMI

1D
2.09%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
21.81%
6M
24.53%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
11.73%

PAA

1D
0.66%
1M
-11.06%
YTD
24.45%
6M
26.56%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
26.80%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
5.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMI vs. PAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
21.81%4.74%64.42%4.10%21.23%23.75%-30.77%44.43%-11.18%-10.56%
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
24.45%14.30%21.38%39.18%35.79%22.24%-50.79%-2.28%2.31%-31.34%

Correlation

The correlation between KMI and PAA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2011

0.57

The correlation between KMI and PAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMI:

$71.76B

PAA:

$15.16B

EPS

KMI:

$1.53

PAA:

$2.19

PE Ratio

KMI:

21.08

PAA:

9.80

PEG Ratio

KMI:

1.28

PAA:

0.18

PS Ratio

KMI:

4.09

PAA:

0.33

PB Ratio

KMI:

2.29

PAA:

1.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMI:

$17.52B

PAA:

$45.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMI:

$5.86B

PAA:

$1.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMI:

$6.90B

PAA:

$2.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMI vs. PAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMI
KMI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PAA
PAA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMI vs. PAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMIPAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.84

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

5.04

-1.12

KMI vs. PAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the PAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMI and PAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMI vs. PAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMI drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, smaller than the maximum PAA drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMI and PAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMIPAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.70%

-91.99%

+19.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-14.53%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-22.26%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.31%

-22.51%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.13%

-87.92%

+32.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-13.88%

+9.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.02%

-25.74%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

5.29%

+0.38%

Volatility

KMI vs. PAA - Volatility Comparison

Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) have volatilities of 6.51% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMIPAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

6.42%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

14.26%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

18.32%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

26.57%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.69%

41.82%

-14.13%

Dividends

KMI vs. PAA - Dividend Comparison

KMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than PAA's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
5.48%4.24%4.18%6.38%6.10%6.76%7.59%4.49%4.71%2.77%2.41%12.94%
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
7.43%8.46%7.44%7.06%7.08%7.71%10.92%7.50%5.99%9.45%8.21%11.93%

Financials

KMI vs. PAA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinder Morgan, Inc. and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
4.83B
12.47B
(KMI) Total Revenue
(PAA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KMI vs. PAA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinder Morgan, Inc. and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
KMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.44B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

PAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 405.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

KMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a net income of 1.06B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

PAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 551.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMI and PAA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMI has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to PAA (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMI dropped -72.70% vs PAA's -91.99%.

PAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMI and PAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer