PortfoliosLab logo
KMI vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KMI and ET is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

KMI vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KMI:

1.98

ET:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

KMI:

2.49

ET:

1.24

Omega Ratio

KMI:

1.41

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

KMI:

1.69

ET:

0.91

Martin Ratio

KMI:

7.30

ET:

2.91

Ulcer Index

KMI:

7.27%

ET:

7.66%

Daily Std Dev

KMI:

25.47%

ET:

27.56%

Max Drawdown

KMI:

-72.70%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

KMI:

-8.38%

ET:

-11.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMI:

$61.04B

ET:

$62.32B

EPS

KMI:

$1.16

ET:

$1.32

PE Ratio

KMI:

23.67

ET:

13.76

PEG Ratio

KMI:

2.42

ET:

0.80

PS Ratio

KMI:

3.94

ET:

0.76

PB Ratio

KMI:

2.00

ET:

1.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMI:

$15.52B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMI:

$7.72B

ET:

$15.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMI:

$5.49B

ET:

$15.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMI achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, KMI has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 0.90%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 1.93% annualized return.


KMI

YTD

4.39%

1M

3.98%

6M

6.89%

1Y

50.08%

5Y*

20.86%

10Y*

0.90%

ET

YTD

-4.99%

1M

7.05%

6M

8.53%

1Y

21.75%

5Y*

31.01%

10Y*

1.93%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KMI vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KMI is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KMI is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KMI is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KMI is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KMI is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KMI is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KMI vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMI and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

KMI vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

KMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than ET's 7.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
4.12%4.18%6.38%6.10%6.76%7.59%4.49%4.71%2.77%2.41%12.94%4.02%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.21%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

KMI vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMI drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMI and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KMI vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) is 7.91%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that KMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KMI vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinder Morgan, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
4.24B
21.02B
(KMI) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KMI vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinder Morgan, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
50.8%
19.4%
(KMI) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
KMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.16B and revenue of 4.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.8%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

KMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.0%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

KMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a net income of 717.00M and revenue of 4.24B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.