PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. CRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XYLD vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XYLD vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-0.58%8.02%13.96%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
18.37%-13.40%-51.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 18.37% return.


XYLD

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
5.60%
1Y
10.98%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
7.92%

CRSH

1D
-1.76%
1M
6.01%
YTD
18.37%
6M
24.09%
1Y
-24.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYLD vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLDCRSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

-0.57

+1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

-0.59

+1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.93

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

-0.55

+1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.37

-0.75

+7.13

XYLD vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and CRSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLDCRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

-0.57

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.64

+1.22

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and CRSH is -0.50. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

XYLD vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.93%, less than CRSH's 100.61% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.93%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
100.61%138.78%94.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and CRSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDCRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-63.68%

+30.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-48.16%

+38.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-53.43%

+50.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-41.91%

+38.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

35.23%

-33.50%

Volatility

XYLD vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 4.03%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XYLDCRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

8.04%

-4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.83%

23.47%

-17.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

42.40%

-28.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

48.37%

-37.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

48.37%

-34.14%