PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXXX vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXXX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 29.32% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.


XXXX

1D
-2.88%
1M
18.44%
YTD
29.32%
6M
26.06%
1Y
86.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXXX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
29.32%17.36%61.36%16.31%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.36%15.42%14.43%3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XXXX and XTJL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.92

The correlation between XXXX and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXXX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXXX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXXXXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.07

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

17.37

-8.42

XXXX vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXXX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXXX and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXXXXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.12

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.65

+0.22

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXXXXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.27%

-23.24%

-39.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.25%

-5.12%

-32.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

0.00%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.60%

-4.04%

-7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.73%

0.90%

+8.83%

Volatility

XXXX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXXXXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.32%

0.33%

+10.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.41%

5.72%

+29.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.83%

7.43%

+39.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.75%

15.22%

+45.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.75%

15.22%

+45.53%

XXXX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXXX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXXX nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XXXX and XTJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XXXX has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXXX dropped -62.27% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 86.73% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 86.73% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

XXXX and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Max and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 2.95% for XXXX and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXXX and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer