XXXX vs. XTJL
XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XXXX is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, XXXX returned 86.73% vs 15.64% for XTJL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XXXX charges 2.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
XXXX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 29.32% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.
XXXX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- 18.44%
- YTD
- 29.32%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 86.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXXX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 29.32% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 15.42% | 14.43% | 3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXXX and XTJL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XXXX and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXXX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
XXXX
XTJL
XXXX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XXXX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 3.07 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 17.37 | -8.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXXX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.12 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.65 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
XXXX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXXX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.27% | -23.24% | -39.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.25% | -5.12% | -32.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | 0.00% | -2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.60% | -4.04% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 0.90% | +8.83% |
Volatility
XXXX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXXX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.32% | 0.33% | +10.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.41% | 5.72% | +29.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.83% | 7.43% | +39.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.75% | 15.22% | +45.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.75% | 15.22% | +45.53% |
XXXX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXXX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither XXXX nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XXXX and XTJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XXXX has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXXX dropped -62.27% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 86.73% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 86.73% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
XXXX and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Max and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 2.95% for XXXX and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XXXX and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer