XXXX vs. RSPU
Compare and contrast key facts about MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU).
XXXX and RSPU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XXXX is a passively managed fund by Max that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 4, 2023. RSPU is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. Both XXXX and RSPU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XXXX vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XXXX vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | -21.85% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 9.81% | 16.82% | 23.57% | 1.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a -21.85% return, which is significantly lower than RSPU's 9.81% return.
XXXX
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -19.38%
- YTD
- -21.85%
- 6M
- -22.09%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPU
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XXXX vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPU's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XXXX vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank
XXXX
RSPU
XXXX vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XXXX | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 1.29 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.75 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 2.43 | -1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 6.02 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXXX | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 1.29 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between XXXX and RSPU is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XXXX vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison
XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.42% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
Drawdowns
XXXX vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than RSPU's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and RSPU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXXX | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.27% | -48.08% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.00% | -8.35% | -34.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.09% | -2.74% | -25.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -7.88% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.33% | 3.37% | +8.96% |
Volatility
XXXX vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) at 4.73%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XXXX | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.30% | 4.73% | +16.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.79% | 9.78% | +28.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.27% | 15.34% | +56.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.75% | 16.81% | +44.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.75% | 19.04% | +42.71% |