XXXX vs. QTAP
Compare and contrast key facts about MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).
XXXX and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XXXX is a passively managed fund by Max that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 4, 2023. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
XXXX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XXXX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | -21.85% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 3.02% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 1.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a -21.85% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 3.02% return.
XXXX
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -19.38%
- YTD
- -21.85%
- 6M
- -22.09%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XXXX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XXXX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
XXXX
QTAP
XXXX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XXXX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 1.29 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 2.05 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.50 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 1.81 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 12.95 | -11.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXXX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 1.29 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.64 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between XXXX and QTAP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XXXX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither XXXX nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XXXX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and QTAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXXX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.27% | -29.44% | -32.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.00% | -12.04% | -30.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.09% | 0.00% | -28.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -5.21% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.33% | 1.68% | +10.65% |
Volatility
XXXX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.88%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XXXX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.30% | 1.88% | +19.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.79% | 3.23% | +34.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.27% | 16.38% | +55.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.75% | 19.03% | +42.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.75% | 19.03% | +42.72% |