PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXXX vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XXXX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XXXX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
-21.85%17.36%61.36%16.31%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
3.02%19.36%17.34%1.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a -21.85% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 3.02% return.


XXXX

1D
2.83%
1M
-19.38%
YTD
-21.85%
6M
-22.09%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAP

1D
1.74%
1M
1.79%
YTD
3.02%
6M
5.43%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XXXX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XXXX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXXX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXXXQTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.29

1.29

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

2.05

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.50

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.81

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.80

12.95

-11.14

XXXX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXXX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXXX and QTAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXXXQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

1.29

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.64

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between XXXX and QTAP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XXXX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXXX nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and QTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XXXXQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.27%

-29.44%

-32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.00%

-12.04%

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.09%

0.00%

-28.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.06%

-5.21%

-6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.33%

1.68%

+10.65%

Volatility

XXXX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.88%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XXXXQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.30%

1.88%

+19.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.79%

3.23%

+34.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.27%

16.38%

+55.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.75%

19.03%

+42.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.75%

19.03%

+42.72%