PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXXX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
-21.85%17.36%61.36%16.31%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%4.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a -21.85% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.


XXXX

1D
2.83%
1M
-19.38%
YTD
-21.85%
6M
-22.09%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXXX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXXX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.29

0.92

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

1.41

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.41

-0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.80

6.61

-4.81

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXXX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXXX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXXX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

0.92

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.46

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between XXXX and ^GSPC is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XXXX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.27%

-56.78%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.00%

-12.14%

-30.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.09%

-5.78%

-22.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.06%

-10.75%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.33%

2.60%

+9.73%

Volatility

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XXXX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.30%

5.37%

+15.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.79%

9.55%

+28.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.27%

18.33%

+53.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.75%

16.90%

+44.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.75%

18.05%

+43.70%