XXX vs. TBFG
XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. XXX is passively managed, while TBFG is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XXX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.
Performance
XXX vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XXX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXX vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | -2.56% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 6.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXX and TBFG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXX vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank
XXX
TBFG
XXX vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXX | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 1.39 | -1.70 |
Drawdowns
XXX vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, roughly equal to the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and TBFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXX | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -13.43% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -0.28% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -1.62% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
XXX vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXX | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.22% | 9.73% | +13.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 10.94% | +12.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 10.94% | +12.28% |
XXX vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXX vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison
XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than TBFG's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 2.35% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXX and TBFG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.
TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.06% for XXX.
They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 0.42% for TBFG.
Find the right allocation for XXX and TBFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer