PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXX vs. TBFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXX vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XXX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBFG

1D
0.08%
1M
3.51%
YTD
10.44%
6M
11.28%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXX vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XXX and TBFG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXX vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXX

TBFG
TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXX vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XXX vs. TBFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XXXTBFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.32

1.39

-1.70

Drawdowns

XXX vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, roughly equal to the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and TBFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXXTBFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-13.43%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-0.28%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-1.62%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

Volatility

XXX vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXXTBFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.22%

9.73%

+13.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.22%

10.94%

+12.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.22%

10.94%

+12.28%

XXX vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXX vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than TBFG's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
2.35%2.65%2.43%
XXX
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF
0.06%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XXX and TBFG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.06% for XXX.

They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 0.42% for TBFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXX and TBFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer