XXX vs. TBFG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. XXX is passively managed, while TBFG is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XXX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.

Performance

XXX vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XXX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -2.28%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBFG

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -1.24%
• 6M: 6.14%
• YTD: 8.81%
• 1Y: 18.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXX vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF	-4.54%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XXX and TBFG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	0.79

Return for Risk

XXX vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 66
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XXX vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XXX	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.43	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.08	—

Drawdowns

XXX vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and TBFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XXX	TBFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.06%	-13.43%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.79%	-1.75%	-5.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-1.61%	-4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XXX	TBFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.30%	10.65%	+12.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.30%	11.13%	+12.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.30%	11.13%	+12.17%

XXX vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

XXX vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than TBFG's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.41%	2.65%	2.43%
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XXX and TBFG in my portfolio?

XXX and TBFG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XXX or TBFG?

On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XXX or TBFG?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XXX or TBFG?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.09% for XXX.

What is the main difference between XXX and TBFG?

They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 0.42% for TBFG.