XXX vs. ELM
XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) and ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. XXX is passively managed, while ELM is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XXX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ELM.
Performance
XXX vs. ELM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XXX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELM
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXX vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | -1.38% |
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXX and ELM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXX vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank
XXX
ELM
XXX vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXX | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 1.55 | -1.72 |
Drawdowns
XXX vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, which is greater than ELM's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and ELM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXX | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -9.02% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | 0.00% | -3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -1.32% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.81% | — |
Volatility
XXX vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXX | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 9.37% | +14.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 10.27% | +13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 10.27% | +13.17% |
XXX vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXX vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison
XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than ELM's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF | 2.51% | 2.71% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXX and ELM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.
ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.06% for XXX.
They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and Elm. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 0.24% for ELM.
Find the right allocation for XXX and ELM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer