PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XXX vs. GMOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XXX vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XXX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-2.28%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMOD

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.29%
6M
5.04%
YTD
7.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XXX vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XXX and GMOD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XXX vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XXX vs. GMOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XXX vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -13.06%, which is greater than GMOD's maximum drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and GMOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XXXGMODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-6.50%

-6.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-0.55%

-6.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-1.09%

-4.71%

Volatility

XXX vs. GMOD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XXXGMODDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

8.83%

+14.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.30%

8.83%

+14.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

8.83%

+14.47%

XXX vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XXX vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison

XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than GMOD's 1.37% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XXX and GMOD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.09% for XXX.

They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 0.50% for GMOD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XXX and GMOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer