XXRP vs. CANE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XXRP (Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF) and CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Teucrium, while CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. XXRP is actively managed, while CANE is passively managed. Over the past year, XXRP returned -94.80% vs -11.17% for CANE. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XXRP charges 1.89%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for CANE.

Performance

XXRP vs. CANE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXRP achieves a -78.34% return, which is significantly lower than CANE's -1.38% return.

XXRP

• 1D: -5.76%
• 1M: -7.29%
• 6M: -74.27%
• YTD: -78.34%
• 1Y: -94.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -85.25%

CANE

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 4.11%
• YTD: -1.38%
• 1Y: -11.17%
• 3Y*: -10.64%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: -2.68%
• ALL TIME*: -6.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	$1.32M	$1.65M	$3.43M
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF	$3.69M	$3.82M	$7.73M

XXRP vs. CANE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF	-78.34%	-62.48%
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	-1.38%	-19.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XXRP and CANE is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025	0.10

Return for Risk

XXRP vs. CANE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XXRP

XXRP Risk / Return Rank: 2
XXRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
XXRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
XXRP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
XXRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
XXRP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CANE

CANE Risk / Return Rank: 5
CANE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CANE Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XXRP vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XXRP	CANE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	-0.59	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.96	-0.73	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	0.92	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.60	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	-0.89	-0.35

XXRP vs. CANE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XXRP Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is comparable to the CANE Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXRP and CANE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XXRP vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.66%, which is greater than CANE's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXRP and CANE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XXRP	CANE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.66%	-81.30%	-15.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.81%	-19.82%	-75.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-41.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.57%	-63.44%	-33.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.91%	-56.56%	-7.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	76.81%	13.33%	+63.48%

Volatility

XXRP vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) has a higher volatility of 24.76% compared to Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) at 5.03%. This indicates that XXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XXRP	CANE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.76%	5.03%	+19.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.06%	16.18%	+85.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	143.25%	20.20%	+123.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.16%	20.92%	+122.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.16%	21.58%	+121.58%

XXRP vs. CANE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXRP has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CANE's 1.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

XXRP vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison

XXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.15%, while CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund	0.00%	0.00%
XXRP Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF	30.15%	6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XXRP and CANE in my portfolio?

XXRP and CANE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XXRP or CANE?

XXRP has higher volatility (24.76%) compared to CANE (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXRP dropped -96.66% vs CANE's -81.30%.

Which ETF is better, XXRP or CANE?

On 1-year performance, CANE leads with -11.17% vs -94.80% for XXRP. On fees, CANE is cheaper at 1.88% per year. On volatility, CANE has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XXRP or CANE?

Over the 1-year period, CANE has performed better with a -11.17% return vs -94.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XXRP or CANE?

CANE is cheaper with a 1.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XXRP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XXRP or CANE?

XXRP has the higher dividend yield at 30.15%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.

What is the main difference between XXRP and CANE?

XXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while CANE is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.89% for XXRP and 1.88% for CANE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CANE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.