XUSP vs. FFTY
XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUSP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. XUSP is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XUSP returned 25.24%/yr vs 21.57%/yr for FFTY. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUSP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
XUSP vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUSP achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.
XUSP
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 33.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
XUSP vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 12.67% | 18.27% | 30.60% | 26.46% | -9.24% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -24.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUSP and FFTY is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XUSP and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUSP vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUSP
FFTY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
XUSP
FFTY
Financial Services
XUSP
FFTY
Communication Services
XUSP
FFTY
Consumer Cyclical
XUSP
FFTY
Healthcare
XUSP
FFTY
Industrials
XUSP
FFTY
Consumer Defensive
XUSP
FFTY
-
Energy
XUSP
FFTY
Utilities
XUSP
FFTY
Real Estate
XUSP
FFTY
-
Basic Materials
XUSP
FFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUSP vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
XUSP
FFTY
XUSP vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUSP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.65 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.82 | 4.36 | +7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUSP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.12 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.20 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
XUSP vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUSP drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSP and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUSP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -59.46% | +36.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -23.29% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.59% | -29.60% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -15.34% | +14.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -22.38% | +17.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 8.77% | -5.91% |
Volatility
XUSP vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) is 4.13%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that XUSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUSP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 9.42% | -5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 26.18% | -14.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 34.09% | -18.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 29.14% | -9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 27.41% | -8.20% |
XUSP vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUSP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUSP vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
XUSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUSP and FFTY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to XUSP (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUSP dropped -22.59% vs FFTY's -59.46%.
On 3-year performance, XUSP leads with 25.24% vs 21.57% for FFTY. On fees, XUSP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XUSP has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 25.24% return vs 21.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XUSP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for XUSP.
XUSP is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XUSP and 0.80% for FFTY.
XUSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XUSP and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer