PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSP vs. TJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSP vs. TJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSP achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than TJUL's 2.07% return.


XUSP

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
10.53%
6M
9.88%
1Y
31.76%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
10Y*

TJUL

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.10%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.08%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSP vs. TJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XUSP
Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF
10.53%18.27%30.60%6.07%
TJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025
2.07%6.55%8.18%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSP and TJUL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023

0.76

The correlation between XUSP and TJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSP vs. TJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSP
XUSP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XUSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TJUL
TJUL Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSP vs. TJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUSPTJULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.67

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

12.29

-1.52

XUSP vs. TJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the TJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSP and TJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUSP vs. TJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSP drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than TJUL's maximum drawdown of -4.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSP and TJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSPTJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-4.61%

-17.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-2.08%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-0.13%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-0.39%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.45%

+2.51%

Volatility

XUSP vs. TJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF – 2 Yr to July 2025 (TJUL) at 0.77%. This indicates that XUSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSPTJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

0.77%

+5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

2.23%

+10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

2.85%

+13.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

4.24%

+15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

4.24%

+15.08%

XUSP vs. TJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUSP and TJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

XUSP vs. TJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XUSP nor TJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSP and TJUL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XUSP has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to TJUL (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUSP dropped -22.59% vs TJUL's -4.61%.

On 1-year performance, XUSP leads with 31.76% vs 5.54% for TJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, TJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 31.76% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XUSP and TJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

XUSP and TJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

TJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSP and TJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer