XUSP vs. RSSB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) and RSSB (Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUSP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while RSSB is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XUSP returned 36.05% vs 29.57% for RSSB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XUSP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for RSSB.

Performance

XUSP vs. RSSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSP achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly higher than RSSB's 10.92% return.

XUSP

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 7.26%
• YTD: 13.64%
• 6M: 13.55%
• 1Y: 36.05%
• 3Y*: 25.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSSB

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 10.92%
• 6M: 11.83%
• 1Y: 29.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSP vs. RSSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF	13.64%	18.27%	30.60%	6.49%
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	10.92%	25.16%	10.53%	6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSP and RSSB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023	0.83

The correlation between XUSP and RSSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUSP vs. RSSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XUSP	RSSB
Technology	36.2%	27.9%
Financial Services	11.9%	15.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.7%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.2%
Industrials	8.1%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.0%
Energy	3.5%	4.3%
Utilities	2.3%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.1%

Return for Risk

XUSP vs. RSSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSP

XUSP Risk / Return Rank: 65
XUSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XUSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
XUSP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
XUSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
XUSP Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RSSB

RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 56
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSP vs. RSSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XUSP	RSSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	1.95	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.70	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	2.57	+0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.72	10.54	+2.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUSP vs. RSSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSP Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the RSSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSP and RSSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XUSP	RSSB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	1.95	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	1.33	-0.27

Drawdowns

XUSP vs. RSSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSP drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than RSSB's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSP and RSSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XUSP	RSSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-16.21%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.13%	-11.63%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-2.27%	-2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	2.83%	+0.03%

Volatility

XUSP vs. RSSB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) is 4.07%, while Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that XUSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XUSP	RSSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	4.84%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	12.61%	-0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	15.20%	+0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.21%	16.58%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	16.58%	+2.63%

XUSP vs. RSSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSB's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

XUSP vs. RSSB - Dividend Comparison

XUSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RSSB Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF	3.14%	3.48%	1.10%	0.61%
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XUSP and RSSB in my portfolio?

XUSP and RSSB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XUSP or RSSB?

RSSB has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to XUSP (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUSP dropped -22.59% vs RSSB's -16.21%.

Which ETF is better, XUSP or RSSB?

On 1-year performance, XUSP leads with 36.05% vs 29.57% for RSSB. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, XUSP has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XUSP or RSSB?

Over the 1-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 36.05% return vs 29.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XUSP or RSSB?

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XUSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XUSP or RSSB?

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.00% for XUSP.

What is the main difference between XUSP and RSSB?

XUSP is categorized as Options Trading, while RSSB is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XUSP and 0.41% for RSSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XUSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.