PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSP vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSP vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSP achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.


XUSP

1D
1.10%
1M
0.00%
6M
8.64%
YTD
10.22%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.06%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$160.15K$235.06K$257.19K

XUSP vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XUSP
Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF
10.22%18.27%30.60%26.46%-10.20%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%-6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XUSP and BNO is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2022

0.02

The correlation between XUSP and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSP vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XUSP
XUSP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XUSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XUSP vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XUSPBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.70

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

5.15

+1.61

XUSP vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSP and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUSP vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSP drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSP and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSPBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-87.06%

+64.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-34.46%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

-34.46%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-16.21%

+13.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-39.99%

+35.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

11.86%

-8.69%

Volatility

XUSP vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) is 4.75%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that XUSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSPBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

17.47%

-12.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

40.96%

-27.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

44.54%

-27.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

36.41%

-17.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

36.98%

-17.73%

XUSP vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUSP vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither XUSP nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSP and BNO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to XUSP (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUSP dropped -22.59% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 3-year performance, XUSP leads with 21.09% vs 20.31% for BNO. On fees, XUSP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XUSP has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 21.09% return vs 20.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XUSP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

XUSP and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

XUSP is categorized as Options Trading, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XUSP and 1.00% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSP and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer