PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEK.L vs. MMS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUEK.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XUEK.L

1D
0.80%
1M
3.49%
YTD
5.66%
6M
7.69%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*

MMS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XUEK.L
Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF
5.66%23.26%-2.02%
MMS.L
Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUEK.L
MMS.L

Financial Services

23.5%
16.9%

Industrials

21.2%
21.8%

Healthcare

13.0%
7.7%

Technology

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
1.7%

Utilities

4.9%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.5%
5.9%

Energy

3.8%
5.6%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.6%
12.8%

Financial Services

XUEK.L
23.5%
MMS.L
16.9%

Industrials

XUEK.L
21.2%
MMS.L
21.8%

Healthcare

XUEK.L
13.0%
MMS.L
7.7%

Technology

XUEK.L
10.9%
MMS.L
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XUEK.L
7.1%
MMS.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

XUEK.L
7.0%
MMS.L
1.7%

Utilities

XUEK.L
4.9%
MMS.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

XUEK.L
4.5%
MMS.L
5.9%

Energy

XUEK.L
3.8%
MMS.L
5.6%

Communication Services

XUEK.L
3.6%
MMS.L
3.0%

Real Estate

XUEK.L
0.6%
MMS.L
12.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEK.L
XUEK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
XUEK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MMS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEK.LMMS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEK.LMMS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEK.LMMS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

Volatility

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEK.LMMS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUEK.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

XUEK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MMS.L
Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUEK.L
Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.05%0.01%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XUEK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.

XUEK.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUEK.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEK.L and MMS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer