MMS.L vs. LCPE.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. MMS.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.

Performance

MMS.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MMS.L is traded in GBP, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

MMS.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCPE.L

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 14.34%
• 1Y: 28.26%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 9.55%
• 10Y*: 10.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMS.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS	13.75%	18.88%	-3.10%

MMS.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MMS.L	LCPE.L
Industrials	21.8%	0.2%
Financial Services	16.9%	-
Real Estate	12.8%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	1.9%
Technology	10.3%	0.2%
Healthcare	7.7%	32.6%
Basic Materials	5.9%	32.3%
Energy	5.6%	0.0%
Utilities	3.4%	-
Communication Services	3.0%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	32.8%

Return for Risk

MMS.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCPE.L

LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMS.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMS.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.98	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MMS.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-27.05%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.66%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.39%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.09%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.52%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMS.L	LCPE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.31%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.75%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	20.61%	—

MMS.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMS.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MMS.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MMS.L or LCPE.L?

On fees, MMS.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMS.L or LCPE.L?

MMS.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

What is the main difference between MMS.L and LCPE.L?

MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MMS.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.