PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEK.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEK.L achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 11.99% return.


XUEK.L

1D
0.80%
1M
3.49%
YTD
5.66%
6M
7.69%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*

UD03.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.74%
YTD
11.99%
6M
14.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUEK.L
Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF
5.66%23.26%0.43%12.46%-11.69%15.48%4.79%1.64%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
11.99%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEK.L and UD03.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.24

Over the past year, XUEK.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUEK.L
UD03.L

Financial Services

23.5%
28.5%

Industrials

21.2%
12.1%

Healthcare

13.0%
4.1%

Technology

10.9%
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
14.6%

Utilities

4.9%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.5%
4.2%

Energy

3.8%
2.7%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.1%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Financial Services

XUEK.L
23.5%
UD03.L
28.5%

Industrials

XUEK.L
21.2%
UD03.L
12.1%

Healthcare

XUEK.L
13.0%
UD03.L
4.1%

Technology

XUEK.L
10.9%
UD03.L
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XUEK.L
7.1%
UD03.L
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

XUEK.L
7.0%
UD03.L
14.6%

Utilities

XUEK.L
4.9%
UD03.L
7.7%

Basic Materials

XUEK.L
4.5%
UD03.L
4.2%

Energy

XUEK.L
3.8%
UD03.L
2.7%

Communication Services

XUEK.L
3.6%
UD03.L
3.1%

Real Estate

XUEK.L
0.6%
UD03.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEK.L
XUEK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
XUEK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEK.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.61

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

5.67

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

16.11

-11.12

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEK.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEK.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

3.44

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.74

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.19

-0.65

Drawdowns

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEK.L drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEK.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEK.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-30.85%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-9.80%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-11.72%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

-18.67%

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-1.45%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-3.32%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.56%

-0.42%

Volatility

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEK.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.69%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

16.20%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

27.51%

-12.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

47.36%

-30.99%

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUEK.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

XUEK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than UD03.L's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.55%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%
XUEK.L
Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.05%0.01%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUEK.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUEK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

XUEK.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUEK.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEK.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer