MMS.L vs. EEUD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEUD.L).
MMS.L and EEUD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MMS.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 7, 2017. EEUD.L is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Mar 6, 2019. Both MMS.L and EEUD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEUD.L iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | -1.13% | 23.28% | 1.96% |
Returns By Period
MMS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 16.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EEUD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
MMS.L
EEUD.L
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMS.L | EEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.57 | — |
Dividends
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEUD.L iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.57% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 2.76% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.92% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMS.L drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum EEUD.L drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMS.L and EEUD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMS.L | EEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -27.37% | +27.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -11.10% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.11% | +9.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.06% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 3.00% | -3.00% |
Volatility
MMS.L vs. EEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEUD.L) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that MMS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMS.L | EEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 6.33% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 9.20% | -9.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 13.97% | -13.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 13.81% | -13.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 15.64% | -15.64% |