XUEK.L vs. VERX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF Distributing (VERX.L).
XUEK.L and VERX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XUEK.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. It was launched on Jan 14, 2019. VERX.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. Both XUEK.L and VERX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XUEK.L or VERX.L.
Key characteristics
| XUEK.L | VERX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.60% | 3.39% |
| 1Y Return | 12.28% | 11.94% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.89% | 3.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.21% | 7.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.08 | 1.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.54 | 1.57 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.57 | 1.67 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.25 | 4.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.75% | 2.55% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.81% | 10.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.36% | -27.64% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.04% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUEK.L and VERX.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XUEK.L vs. VERX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XUEK.L achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly higher than VERX.L's 3.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XUEK.L vs. VERX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUEK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VERX.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XUEK.L vs. VERX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF Distributing (VERX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XUEK.L vs. VERX.L - Dividend Comparison
XUEK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than VERX.L's 2.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUEK.L Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF | 2.84% | 2.55% | 4.50% | 1.45% | 2.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VERX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.59% | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.97% | 3.13% | 2.65% | 2.63% | 2.52% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
XUEK.L vs. VERX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUEK.L drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, roughly equal to the maximum VERX.L drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEK.L and VERX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XUEK.L vs. VERX.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF Distributing (VERX.L) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.